FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 1, 2003

Contact:
Anne Johnson, Director of Communications, (202) 523-3240, ext. 27

WASHINGTON - This week marks the sixth anniversary of Hong Kong's handover to Chinese rule. Hong Kong and Chinese leaders who will celebrate this occasion in Hong Kong will be joined by tens of thousands of people who are concerned about the proposed legislation to implement Article 23 of the constitution. The freedoms of the citizens of Hong Kong should not be eroded by implementing new repressive legislation. "Hong Kong has been the beacon of freedom and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region for many decades. Let us keep the light on for future generations," said Commission Chair Felice D. Gaer.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) joins the White House, the Congress, and many others in calling for the Hong Kong government to halt the implementation of Article 23 of its constitution, the Basic Law. The Commission commends the White House and the State Department for their statements opposing the implementation of Article 23, the U.S. House of Representatives for passing House Resolution 277, and welcomes the introduction in the Senate of Joint Resolution 14, both of which urge the governments of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and the People's Republic of China to withdraw the proposed implementation of Article 23.

The Basic Law stipulates that the concept of "one country, two systems" would apply to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 50 years after it became a Chinese territory in 1997. According to this concept, Hong Kong would enjoy autonomy in legislative, executive, and judicial matters vis-à-vis the government of the People's Republic of China. The implementation of Article 23, however, would undermine that autonomy by forcing Hong Kong laws to gradually conform to those on Mainland China, where the legal system has permitted the casual and systematic misuse of concerns regarding "national security" to suppress political dissent and religious activities. The implementation of Article 23 not only contravenes international understandings regarding the principle of "one country, two systems," but also signals a regression in Hong Kong's overall political development and respect for human rights.

Article 23 of the Basic Law would threaten the human rights, including religious freedom, of all residents of Hong Kong. It stipulates that the Hong Kong government shall enact laws to prohibit "any act of treason, secession, sedition, or subversion against" the Chinese government, the "theft of state secrets," the operation of "foreign political organizations" in Hong Kong, and the establishment of ties between Hong Kong political organizations and foreign political organizations. To this end, the Hong Kong government has introduced a national security bill, which could be enacted by Hong Kong's Legislative Council on July 9.

Particularly troublesome is the draft bill's provision that would allow the Hong Kong government to bar or close down organizations that are banned by the Chinese government on national security grounds. This would have serious negative implications for religious organizations like the Catholic Church, other Christian communities, and others such as the Falun Gong, that the government has labeled "evil cults." Falun Gong practitioners, particularly those who reside outside China, have been accused by Chinese national security agents of acting as foreign agents.

Hong Kong officials have argued that many democratic societies around the world also have anti-subversion laws similar to the one that was proposed by the Hong Kong government. However, the Commission notes that in many of those societies, there are effective legislative and judicial institutions that protect the rights of their citizens as the laws are implemented. The Commission further notes that a majority of the current Hong Kong Legislative Council members were not elected by universal suffrage. The implementation of Article 23 should not precede the establishment of a legislature by the universal consent of the Hong Kong people.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to monitor the status of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief abroad, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related international instruments, and to give independent policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State and the Congress.

Felice D. Gaer, Chair

• Dean Michael K. Young, Vice Chair Preeta BansalRichard LandBishop William F. MurphyBishop Ricardo RamirezLeila Nadya SadatNina SheaAmbassador John V. Hanford III, Ex-Officio Joseph R. Crapa, Executive Director

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 27, 2003

Contact:
Anne Johnson, Director of Communications, (202) 523-3240 (202) 523-3240, ext. 27

WASHINGTON - In written testimony submitted to a joint hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights, and Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, on "Constitutionalism, Human Rights and the Rule of Law in Iraq," the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) urged the U.S. government to ensure that the Coalition Provisional Authority headed by L. Paul Bremer focus on rebuilding the justice system in accordance with international standards. Human rights must be fully guaranteed in the new constitution, consistent with international human rights standards, and religious freedom guaranteed for all Iraqis, including its 97 percent Muslim population.

"The United States must guard against those whose interpretation of Islam seeks to deny individual rights or the freedom of religion or belief," said USCIRF Chair Felice D. Gaer.

The text of the testimony follows:

President Bush has spoken eloquently about a democratic Iraq where "the power of freedom [will] transform that vital region...bringing hope and progress into the lives of millions." Furthermore, President Bush has pledged that the U.S. government would help the Iraqis "build a peaceful and representative government that protects the rights of all citizens." This vision for Iraq can only become reality, however, with protections and guarantees of human rights, including religious freedom in a new Iraqi constitution, establishment of the rule of law, development of a vibrant civil society, and establishment of institutions to advance respect for international standards of human rights.

Iraq will not be quickly transformed overnight into a democratic state. Iraq is a country with a rich ethnic and religious diversity with Arab Shiites (approximately 60-65%) comprising the majority of the population, and with large Arab and Sunni Kurdish communities (32-37%). Turkmen, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Armenians, Yazidis, and Mandaeans also make up small, but influential, segments of the population. A government that draws on members of all communities, or at least that represents key segments, would best protect the interests and rights of all Iraqis.

Historically, Iraq has been a pluralistic society, with a rich religious and ethnic diversity, that enjoyed some political and religious freedom before Saddam Hussein came to power. In the 1920s, civil society flourished in Iraq through the formation of numerous professional organizations, civic associations, and political parties. During the 1950s, diverse Iraqis crafted and attempted to bring into existence an ambitious system of laws that brought together Sunni, Shi'a, and European elements. Although Sunni Arabs have historically dominated political life, Iraqis of varying religious and ethnic backgrounds were active in Iraqi politics through the many existing political parties. However, that brief period of political pluralism ended with the Ba'ath party coming to power in 1968.

Religious Freedom Curbed Under Saddam Hussein

For decades, Saddam Hussein's regime conducted a brutal campaign of murder, summary execution, arbitrary arrest, and protracted detention against the religious leaders and followers of the majority Shi'a Muslim population. The government also sought to undermine the identity of minority Christian (Chaldean and Assyrian), Yazidi, and Sabean Mandaean groups. The regime also completely repressed the Baha'i community, and all Baha'i activity was punishable by death. Shi'a Muslims, the largest religious group, faced summary execution, arbitrary arrest, long prison sentences, harassment, destruction and desecration of property, and the decimation of its religious and political leadership. Sunni Muslim Kurds and Turkmen also suffered harshly at the hands of the Saddam Hussein regime. Christians also faced repression, forced relocation, and denial of political rights. The Constitution did not provide recognition for Assyrians, Chaldeans, Yazidis, or Baha'is.

Government repression devastated Shi'ism within Iraq. According to the State Department's religious freedom report, the Iraqi regime "systematically killed senior Shi'a clerics, desecrated Shi'a mosques and holy sites, interfered with Shi'a religious education, and prevented Shi'a adherents from performing their religious rites." There was considerable government control over and interference with Shi'a mosques and religious observances. Traditional Shi'a practices such as the distinctive Shi'a call to prayer and ritual food preparations during the holy month of Muharram were banned in several Shi'a districts. Iraqi security forces interfered with the performance of religious pilgrimages, both to the Shi'a holy cities of southern Iraq and for those Shi'a Muslims wishing to travel to Mecca for the Hajj. Moreover, as religious scholarship in Shi'a Islam is passed from one generation of clerics to another, Iraq's policy of eliminating senior Shi'a clerics threatened the very future of Shi'ism in Iraq.

Historically, Iraqi Christians, in the main, enjoyed freedom of worship. However, the issue of religious freedom for Christians in Iraq is complicated by the fact that lines between ethnic and religious identification are often blurred. Assyrians, for example, regard themselves as ethnically distinct from the majority Arab Iraqis, though the Saddam Hussein regime did not recognize them as such. Chaldeans, however, are generally more integrated into Iraqi society than Assyrians and at times even were favored by the former regime. Local churches often denied the existence of religious persecution under the Ba'athist regime, though Christians reported increasing vulnerability in the face of growing anti-Western sentiment and fear that their communities could become scapegoats due to their churches' perceived association with the West. There have been occasional reports of Muslim Kurds, themselves victims of harsh repression at the hands of the Iraqi government for political and ethnic reasons, attacking Assyrian Christians in northern Iraq. Other religious communities had varied experiences. The Yazidis, whose unique religion contains elements of paganism, Zoroastrianism, Christianity, and Islam, were subjected to persecution.

Political Reconstruction in Post-War Iraq

Since the fall of the Ba'athist regime, Shi'a Muslims have experienced religious freedom for the first time in more than two decades. In April 2003, hundreds of thousands of Shi'a Muslims participated in an important religious pilgrimage into the holy city of Karbala. At the same time, however, some segments of the Shi'a community have been vociferously demanding the implementation of Islamic law (Sharia) in a manner that reportedly threatens to preclude respect for freedom of thought, conscience, religion, or belief for others in contravention of Iraq's commitments to human rights and individual freedoms. It is essential to ensure that the Iraqi people can exercise their religious freedom in full accordance with international human rights standards and the human rights treaties to which Iraq is a party.

Moreover, some recent reports indicate a growing influence of Shi'ite fundamentalism from Iran and extremist Wahhabi influence from Saudi Arabia. Because both of these elements are well organized and funded, other moderate Iraqi religious groups and those that advocate multi-religious cooperation may be overwhelmed. These foreign and intolerant versions of Islam must not be permitted to undermine human rights, including religious freedom, in Iraq. Fortunately, up to now, the most radical Iraqi voices are in the minority. The U.S. government should aid, advance, and protect those who stand for moderation and tolerance. The record to date is mixed. In some cases, hard-line Islamic clergy have been allowed to take over courts, hospitals, neighborhoods, and towns.

Religious freedom must be guaranteed not only to Iraq's non-Muslims, but also to Iraq's Muslims who comprise approximately 97 percent of the population. Iraqi Muslims must have the right to dissent if they so choose. Only if Iraqi reformers and dissidents have the individual right to debate and criticize religiously-sensitive issues will democratic political development occur. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides for individual rights to religious freedom, which no group or community can destroy.

The Commission has observed that religious freedom, individual rights, and tolerance strengthen all societies. A small minority of radical Iraqis advocate that democratic nation-building should not take place in Iraq. Therefore, the U.S. must guard against those whose interpretations of Islam seek to deny individual rights or the freedom of religion or belief. In order to prevent extremist elements gaining strength in Iraq, the U.S. government should ensure that the following recommendations are implemented in the next phase of Iraq's political reconstruction.

Recommendations

National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice assured the Commission in a June 9 letter that "All of Iraq's religious adherents must be free to worship in peace, and must respect each other's right to do so, if Iraq is to flourish as a sovereign country with a democratic government. The promotion and protection of human rights, including religious liberty, is an important component of United States efforts to help the Iraqi people reconstruct their country, free and at peace." To that end, the Commission makes the following recommendations:

• Human rights must be fully guaranteed in the new constitution, consistent with international human rights standards. The new constitution should guarantee that the religious freedom of all Iraqis is protected, that women and members of religious minorities have equal rights to all other Iraqi citizens, that any internationally prohibited, abusive punishments such as flogging, amputations, and stoning are banned, and that non-Muslims will not be subject to Sharia or to any law that may violate international principles of human rights.

• In order to establish the rule of law, which is essential for the protection of human rights, including religious freedom, the U.S. government should ensure that the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq headed by L. Paul Bremer focus on rebuilding the justice system in accordance with international standards.

• The coalition administration should appoint a team of advisors in Iraq to advise on religious affairs and to monitor human rights violations, including freedom of religion.

• In order to rebuild Iraq's civil society, the Pentagon's Office of Rehabilitation and Humanitarian Aid (ORHA) should identify and fund multi-religious and multi-ethnic efforts to meet human needs, rebuild devastated communities, promote religious tolerance and understanding, and discuss values central to good governance and democracy.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to monitor the status of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief abroad, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related international instruments, and to give independent policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State and the Congress.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 25, 2003

Contact:
Anne Johnson, Director of Communications, (202) 523-3240, ext. 27

WASHINGTON - At a press conference today on North Korea held by Sen. Sam Brownback, Executive Director Joseph R. Crapa of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), an independent and bipartisan federal agency, delivered on behalf of the Commissioners the statement below. At the press conference, Sen. Brownback introduced legislation to allow North Korean refugees to apply for refugee status or asylum in the United States.

Statement by Joseph R. Crapa, Executive Director, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, June 25, 2003:

Introduction

The Commission commends Senator Brownback for his leadership on this issue and for introducing this timely legislation. We also thank him for giving the Commission an opportunity to join in the call for greater U.S. leadership on addressing the plight of the North Korean people.

The people of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea or DPRK) are among the least free on earth, barely surviving under a totalitarian regime that denies basic human dignity and lets them starve while pursuing military might and weapons of mass destruction. By all accounts, there are no personal freedoms of any kind in North Korea, and no protection for human rights.

North Korea is also a humanitarian disaster of unimaginable proportions. Failed economic policies and natural disasters have reportedly left 1 million or more North Koreans dead from starvation and disease in the last 10 years, and there may be countless millions more, particularly children, who are stunted in both their mental and physical growth. As awful as the physical toll has been, the deprivation of the human spirit must be even greater.

Thousands of North Koreans have fled to China in recent years. Refugees who are either forcibly repatriated or captured after having voluntarily returned to the DPRK are accused of treason; those found to have had contacts with South Koreans or Christian missionaries are subjected to severe punishment, including the death penalty.

The ongoing nuclear crisis has made North Korea a top issue on the U.S. foreign policy agenda. However, U.S. efforts to address North Korea's security threat should not be limited to the dismantling of that country's nuclear weapons program. Efforts should also be directed toward the root of the problem, which is the existence of a North Korean regime that has not only terrorized the world, but also brutally oppressed its own people. The U.S. government should lead the international effort to end the plight of the North Korean people.

Religious Freedom Conditions

Religious freedom does not exist, and what little religious activity that is permitted by the government appears staged for foreign visitors. The Commission has received reports that officials have arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and sometimes executed North Korean citizens who are found to have ties with overseas Christian evangelical groups operating across the border in China, as well as those who engage in unauthorized religious activities such as public religious expression and persuasion.

Officials have stratified North Korean society into 51 sub-classes on the basis of family background and perceived loyalty to the regime. Religious adherents are by definition relegated to a lower category than others, receiving fewer privileges and opportunities, such as education and employment. Persons in lower categories have reportedly been denied food aid. The Commission learned from testimony by defectors and experts at its January 2002 hearing that prisoners held on the basis of their religious beliefs are treated worse than other inmates. Christians are reportedly subject to constant abuse from prison officials in an effort to force them to renounce their faith. When they refuse, these religious prisoners are often beaten and sometimes tortured to death.

Commission Recommendations

The deplorable human rights and humanitarian conditions in North Korea have forced many North Koreans to seek refuge in China. However, while in China, these refugees experience numerous difficulties, particularly from the government's ongoing crackdown on their presence. The Chinese government's reaction has forced the refugees to remain in hiding and many have been exploited and abused as a result. In the light of these circumstances, the U.S. government must take a leadership role to resettle the North Korean refugees. Sen. Brownback's proposed legislation, if passed, would mark an important step in this regard.

In the meantime, however, the U.S. government should press upon China, Russia, and other members of the international community to grant refugee status to North Koreans. The U.S. government should also urge the Chinese government to allow South Koreans and international NGOs greater access to northern China and greater capacity to serve the needs of North Korean refugees.

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom was created by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 to monitor the status of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief abroad, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related international instruments, and to give independent policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State and the Congress.